-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
Fix rsqrt inaccuracies. #88691
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix rsqrt inaccuracies. #88691
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This ports XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir Author: Johannes Reifferscheid (jreiffers) ChangesThe current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This ports XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88691.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/ComplexToStandard.cpp b/mlir/lib/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/ComplexToStandard.cpp
index 49eb575212ffc1..3ebee9baff31bd 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/ComplexToStandard.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/ComplexToStandard.cpp
@@ -27,9 +27,11 @@ using namespace mlir;
namespace {
-// Returns the absolute value or its square root.
+enum class AbsFn { abs, sqrt, rsqrt };
+
+// Returns the absolute value, its square root or its reciprocal square root.
Value computeAbs(Value real, Value imag, arith::FastMathFlags fmf,
- ImplicitLocOpBuilder &b, bool returnSqrt = false) {
+ ImplicitLocOpBuilder &b, AbsFn fn = AbsFn::abs) {
Value one = b.create<arith::ConstantOp>(real.getType(),
b.getFloatAttr(real.getType(), 1.0));
@@ -43,7 +45,13 @@ Value computeAbs(Value real, Value imag, arith::FastMathFlags fmf,
Value ratioSqPlusOne = b.create<arith::AddFOp>(ratioSq, one, fmf);
Value result;
- if (returnSqrt) {
+ if (fn == AbsFn::rsqrt) {
+ ratioSqPlusOne = b.create<math::RsqrtOp>(ratioSqPlusOne, fmf);
+ min = b.create<math::RsqrtOp>(min, fmf);
+ max = b.create<math::RsqrtOp>(max, fmf);
+ }
+
+ if (fn == AbsFn::sqrt) {
Value quarter = b.create<arith::ConstantOp>(
real.getType(), b.getFloatAttr(real.getType(), 0.25));
// sqrt(sqrt(a*b)) would avoid the pow, but will overflow more easily.
@@ -863,7 +871,7 @@ struct SqrtOpConversion : public OpConversionPattern<complex::SqrtOp> {
Value real = b.create<complex::ReOp>(elementType, adaptor.getComplex());
Value imag = b.create<complex::ImOp>(elementType, adaptor.getComplex());
- Value absSqrt = computeAbs(real, imag, fmf, b, /*returnSqrt=*/true);
+ Value absSqrt = computeAbs(real, imag, fmf, b, AbsFn::sqrt);
Value argArg = b.create<math::Atan2Op>(imag, real, fmf);
Value sqrtArg = b.create<arith::MulFOp>(argArg, half, fmf);
Value cos = b.create<math::CosOp>(sqrtArg, fmf);
@@ -1147,18 +1155,74 @@ struct RsqrtOpConversion : public OpConversionPattern<complex::RsqrtOp> {
LogicalResult
matchAndRewrite(complex::RsqrtOp op, OpAdaptor adaptor,
ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
- mlir::ImplicitLocOpBuilder builder(op.getLoc(), rewriter);
+ mlir::ImplicitLocOpBuilder b(op.getLoc(), rewriter);
auto type = cast<ComplexType>(adaptor.getComplex().getType());
auto elementType = cast<FloatType>(type.getElementType());
- Value c = builder.create<arith::ConstantOp>(
- elementType, builder.getFloatAttr(elementType, -0.5));
- Value d = builder.create<arith::ConstantOp>(
- elementType, builder.getFloatAttr(elementType, 0));
+ arith::FastMathFlags fmf = op.getFastMathFlagsAttr().getValue();
+
+ auto cst = [&](APFloat v) {
+ return b.create<arith::ConstantOp>(elementType,
+ b.getFloatAttr(elementType, v));
+ };
+ const auto &floatSemantics = elementType.getFloatSemantics();
+ Value zero = cst(APFloat::getZero(floatSemantics));
+ Value inf = cst(APFloat::getInf(floatSemantics));
+ Value negHalf = b.create<arith::ConstantOp>(
+ elementType, b.getFloatAttr(elementType, -0.5));
+ Value nan = cst(APFloat::getNaN(floatSemantics));
+
+ Value real = b.create<complex::ReOp>(elementType, adaptor.getComplex());
+ Value imag = b.create<complex::ImOp>(elementType, adaptor.getComplex());
+ Value absRsqrt = computeAbs(real, imag, fmf, b, AbsFn::rsqrt);
+ Value argArg = b.create<math::Atan2Op>(imag, real, fmf);
+ Value rsqrtArg = b.create<arith::MulFOp>(argArg, negHalf, fmf);
+ Value cos = b.create<math::CosOp>(rsqrtArg, fmf);
+ Value sin = b.create<math::SinOp>(rsqrtArg, fmf);
+
+ Value resultReal = b.create<arith::MulFOp>(absRsqrt, cos, fmf);
+ Value resultImag = b.create<arith::MulFOp>(absRsqrt, sin, fmf);
+
+ if (!arith::bitEnumContainsAll(fmf, arith::FastMathFlags::nnan |
+ arith::FastMathFlags::ninf)) {
+ Value negOne = b.create<arith::ConstantOp>(
+ elementType, b.getFloatAttr(elementType, -1));
+
+ Value realSignedZero = b.create<math::CopySignOp>(zero, real, fmf);
+ Value imagSignedZero = b.create<math::CopySignOp>(zero, imag, fmf);
+ Value negImagSignedZero =
+ b.create<arith::MulFOp>(negOne, imagSignedZero, fmf);
- rewriter.replaceOp(op,
- {powOpConversionImpl(builder, type, adaptor.getComplex(),
- c, d, op.getFastmath())});
+ Value absReal = b.create<math::AbsFOp>(real, fmf);
+ Value absImag = b.create<math::AbsFOp>(imag, fmf);
+
+ Value absImagIsInf =
+ b.create<arith::CmpFOp>(arith::CmpFPredicate::OEQ, absImag, inf, fmf);
+ Value realIsNan =
+ b.create<arith::CmpFOp>(arith::CmpFPredicate::UNO, real, real, fmf);
+ Value realIsInf =
+ b.create<arith::CmpFOp>(arith::CmpFPredicate::OEQ, absReal, inf, fmf);
+ Value inIsNanInf = b.create<arith::AndIOp>(absImagIsInf, realIsNan);
+
+ Value resultIsZero = b.create<arith::OrIOp>(inIsNanInf, realIsInf);
+
+ resultReal =
+ b.create<arith::SelectOp>(resultIsZero, realSignedZero, resultReal);
+ resultImag = b.create<arith::SelectOp>(resultIsZero, negImagSignedZero,
+ resultImag);
+ }
+
+ Value isRealZero =
+ b.create<arith::CmpFOp>(arith::CmpFPredicate::OEQ, real, zero, fmf);
+ Value isImagZero =
+ b.create<arith::CmpFOp>(arith::CmpFPredicate::OEQ, imag, zero, fmf);
+ Value isZero = b.create<arith::AndIOp>(isRealZero, isImagZero);
+
+ resultReal = b.create<arith::SelectOp>(isZero, inf, resultReal);
+ resultImag = b.create<arith::SelectOp>(isZero, nan, resultImag);
+
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<complex::CreateOp>(op, type, resultReal,
+ resultImag);
return success();
}
};
diff --git a/mlir/test/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/convert-to-standard.mlir b/mlir/test/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/convert-to-standard.mlir
index e0e7cdadd317d2..8b4ea9777f7976 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/convert-to-standard.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Conversion/ComplexToStandard/convert-to-standard.mlir
@@ -837,6 +837,21 @@ func.func @complex_rsqrt(%arg: complex<f32>) -> complex<f32> {
return %rsqrt : complex<f32>
}
+// CHECK-COUNT-5: arith.select
+// CHECK-NOT: arith.select
+
+// -----
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: func @complex_rsqrt_nnan_ninf
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG:.*]]: complex<f32>
+func.func @complex_rsqrt_nnan_ninf(%arg: complex<f32>) -> complex<f32> {
+ %sqrt = complex.rsqrt %arg fastmath<nnan,ninf> : complex<f32>
+ return %sqrt : complex<f32>
+}
+
+// CHECK-COUNT-3: arith.select
+// CHECK-NOT: arith.select
+
// -----
// CHECK-LABEL: func.func @complex_angle
@@ -2103,4 +2118,4 @@ func.func @complex_tanh_with_fmf(%arg: complex<f32>) -> complex<f32> {
// CHECK: %[[NUM:.*]] = complex.create %[[TANH_A]], %[[TAN_B]] : complex<f32>
// CHECK: %[[ONE:.*]] = arith.constant 1.000000e+00 : f32
// CHECK: %[[MUL:.*]] = arith.mulf %[[TANH_A]], %[[TAN_B]] fastmath<nnan,contract> : f32
-// CHECK: %[[DENOM:.*]] = complex.create %[[ONE]], %[[MUL]] : complex<f32>
\ No newline at end of file
+// CHECK: %[[DENOM:.*]] = complex.create %[[ONE]], %[[MUL]] : complex<f32>
|
akuegel
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2024
Looks like this breaks a correctness test, reverting. |
jreiffers
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
This reverts commit 8ddaf75.
jreiffers
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
jreiffers
added a commit
to jreiffers/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This po XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters. This updates llvm#88691 to also update the correctness test for rsqrt(0). I checked C++ and Python, they both agree the result should be (inf, nan). Updated the correctness test to match this.
jreiffers
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This po XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters. This updates #88691 to also update the correctness test for rsqrt(0). I checked C++ and Python, they both agree the result should be (inf, nan). Updated the correctness test to match this.
bazuzi
pushed a commit
to bazuzi/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This ports XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters.
bazuzi
pushed a commit
to bazuzi/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
bazuzi
pushed a commit
to bazuzi/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This po XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters. This updates llvm#88691 to also update the correctness test for rsqrt(0). I checked C++ and Python, they both agree the result should be (inf, nan). Updated the correctness test to match this.
aniplcc
pushed a commit
to aniplcc/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This ports XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters.
aniplcc
pushed a commit
to aniplcc/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
aniplcc
pushed a commit
to aniplcc/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This po XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters. This updates llvm#88691 to also update the correctness test for rsqrt(0). I checked C++ and Python, they both agree the result should be (inf, nan). Updated the correctness test to match this.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current lowering has issues with large/subnormal values. This ports XLA's lowering and was verified using XLA's test suite and the MLIR-based emitters.