-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 455
Do not elide find_package() if MONGO_USE_CCACHE is set #1031
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason you're repeating the condition in the
endif()
call?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to not lose track of the corresponding
if ()
given the size of the block, a la#endif // COND
or} // namespace <name>
. I can remove if you think it is undesirable/unnecessary.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It only tends to be a code smell as it is a very very old pattern that is disrecommended anymore in favor of just using prose-like comments for the purpose, but I don't feel strongly about it here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer
endif (<cond>)
overendif () # cond
since CMake actually detects and enforces<cond>
matches, which is a maintainability bonus imo as it prevents (or at least tries to prevent) the possibility of prose-like comments becoming outdated/detached from the matchingif ()
.Admittedly it gets confusing if there are any
elseif() / else ()
blocks involved, so I avoid using it in such cases, but I still prefer using them if it's simple (but large)if() / endif()
blocks. I may reconsider this stance after further thought. 🤔