-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 912
GODRIVER-2277 Remove causal consistency prose test #10 #879
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
prestonvasquez
merged 9 commits into
mongodb:master
from
prestonvasquez:GODRIVER-2277.removeCausalConsistencyProseTest10
Mar 22, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ebd0c1a
GODRIVER-2277 Remove causal consistency prose test #10
prestonvasquez d9768f7
GODRIVER-2277 Remove causal consistency prose test no. 10
prestonvasquez 87acfec
add unack writes subtest to TestSessions
prestonvasquez bf0def2
Merge branch 'GODRIVER-2277.removeCausalConsistencyProseTest10' of gi…
prestonvasquez f2cb620
couple assertion and msg
prestonvasquez a02f062
use non-verbose error handling
prestonvasquez a3b8196
allow error reassignment
prestonvasquez c6090ba
make assert msg more verbose
prestonvasquez 7ba09da
clean up assert msg
prestonvasquez File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious, in what situations does this test fail? It does not fail locally for me against a 5.0 replica set.
If this is client-side error (thrown within the driver), then that could be a valuable test. If the server just doesn't support unacknowledged writes with explicit sessions, then I don't think we need to test that behavior on our side.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test should fail if the
0
-number write concern being sent over the wire is acknowledged, which should request[s] no acknowledgment of the write operation.The error itself is thrown by the
*mongo.Collection.InsertOne
method, specifically whenever the wire message flag ismoreToCome
. I can see how we determine this message from the code base, but have no idea why the relationship between unacknowledged writes andmoreToCome
is 1-1. The server does not explicitly create an error for this and it is technically recommended behavior.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed offline, the
moreToCome
bit is set on every unacknowledged write when we are not actively batching. As you mentioned, we throwErrUnacknowledgedWrite
here according to the recommended behavior in the spec.