Skip to content

Bug 2016228: Use arguments to configure pprof-secret #208

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

Problem: The secret used to establish a secure connection with
OLM's pprof endpoint is hardcoded to the
openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager namespace. This cannot work
if OLM is not running in that namespace, as is the case on
HyperShift clusters.

Solutions: Allow users to configure the namespace for the pprof
credentials secret.

Problem: The secret used to establish a secure connection with
OLM's pprof endpoint is hardcoded to the
openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager namespace. This cannot work
if OLM is not running in that namespace, as is the case on
HyperShift clusters.

Solutions: Allow users to configure the namespace for the pprof
credentials secret.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. label Oct 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2021

@awgreene: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2016228, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2016228: Use arguments to configure pprof-secret

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from anik120 and exdx October 21, 2021 02:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 21, 2021
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2021

@awgreene: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2016228, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jianzhangbjz October 21, 2021 02:50
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2021

@awgreene: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2016228, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. labels Oct 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2021

@awgreene: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2016228, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6d684d4 into openshift:master Oct 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2021

@awgreene: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2016228 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2016228: Use arguments to configure pprof-secret

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Oct 25, 2021
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.9

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@awgreene: new pull request created: #212

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

awgreene pushed a commit to awgreene/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
awgreene pushed a commit to awgreene/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2022
…openshift#208)

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: bfa93d1e8c6e0bcc792a85cab5fb8f3086727834
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants