-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-6260: Catalog, fatal error: concurrent map read and map write #440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-6260: Catalog, fatal error: concurrent map read and map write #440
Conversation
… (#2913) * protected subscriptionSyncCounters access to prevent concurrent map writes Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]> * organize map and mutex into single struct Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]> * initialize struct Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]> * use RWMutex to allow concurrent reads Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 2a49a4dddeb3e0fc38b44925bf9bd0d3931d4ff4
Signed-off-by: dtfranz <[email protected]>
Introduces a test that ensure that the UpdateSubsSyncCounterStorage function is thread safe and avoids concurrent map writes. Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: ed4444c
@awgreene: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@awgreene: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6260, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@awgreene: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6260, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/retest |
@awgreene: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/lgtm |
@awgreene: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6260 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
No description provided.