Skip to content

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-6260: Catalog, fatal error: concurrent map read and map write #440

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

awgreene
Copy link
Contributor

@awgreene awgreene commented Feb 6, 2023

No description provided.

dtfranz and others added 3 commits February 1, 2023 21:28
… (#2913)

* protected subscriptionSyncCounters access to prevent concurrent map writes

Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]>

* organize map and mutex into single struct

Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]>

* initialize struct

Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]>

* use RWMutex to allow concurrent reads

Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <[email protected]>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 2a49a4dddeb3e0fc38b44925bf9bd0d3931d4ff4
Signed-off-by: dtfranz <[email protected]>
Introduces a test that ensure that the UpdateSubsSyncCounterStorage
function is thread safe and avoids concurrent map writes.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]>

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: ed4444c
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 6, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2023

@awgreene: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-6260: Catalog, fatal error: concurrent map read and map write

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 6, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@awgreene: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6260, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-5523 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from benluddy and kevinrizza February 6, 2023 14:38
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 6, 2023
@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Feb 8, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 8, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@awgreene: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6260, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.12.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.12.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-5523 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-5523 targets the "4.13.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.13.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Feb 8, 2023

/retest

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor

bandrade commented Feb 9, 2023

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Feb 9, 2023
@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor

bandrade commented Feb 9, 2023

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2023

@awgreene: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@awgreene
Copy link
Contributor Author

awgreene commented Feb 9, 2023

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Feb 9, 2023
@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 9, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2fe8e47 into openshift:release-4.12 Feb 9, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@awgreene: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6260 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants