Skip to content

Give Sources control of invalidation for Snapshots they produce. #2651

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

benluddy
Copy link
Contributor

This moves the hard-coded 5-minute TTL out of the cache and into the
registry-based implementation of cache.Source. The hack that makes
snapshots produced by "virtual" sources is no longer necessary.

/hold

Depends on #2632 now, but could be rebased onto master without much trouble if the other PR gets stuck.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 16, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benluddy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 16, 2022
@benluddy benluddy force-pushed the source-controlled-invalidation branch from 3744d03 to b8fc028 Compare February 16, 2022 21:12
This moves the hard-coded 5-minute TTL out of the cache and into the
registry-based implementation of cache.Source. The hack that makes
snapshots produced by "virtual" sources is no longer necessary.

Signed-off-by: Ben Luddy <[email protected]>
@benluddy benluddy force-pushed the source-controlled-invalidation branch from b8fc028 to 1107c80 Compare February 17, 2022 16:22
@benluddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 17, 2022
@njhale
Copy link
Member

njhale commented Feb 17, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 17, 2022
@benluddy benluddy merged commit 103ed08 into operator-framework:master Feb 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants