Skip to content

Remove unnecessary IBM i variants of tests #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 21, 2021
Merged

Conversation

NattyNarwhal
Copy link
Member

These tended to be identical or disabled a working test. For the latter, I suspect IBM i's SQL dialect compatibility caught up.

@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ IBM-DB2: db2_num_fields() - select
--SKIPIF--
<?php
require_once('skipif.inc');
require_once('skipif3.inc');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change seems unrelated to all the other changes.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually not - it makes the LUW version of this test run on i, since skipif3 handles if a test runs on i (PASE or Db2 Connect). It's incredibly obviously named, no?

I'm guessing like v5r4/6.1 didn't support VALUES...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gotcha. From the diff it looks like an outlier since all the other changes were deleting V6 variants of the tests.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, anything that was TBD removed was prob me restoring the non-PASE version fo the test to work on all platforms...

@NattyNarwhal
Copy link
Member Author

I think I'll merge these; if there's more redundant tests, let me know.

@NattyNarwhal NattyNarwhal merged commit 276e7c0 into master Dec 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants