-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
bugs in fpm logging #4273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bugs in fpm logging #4273
Conversation
This should be addressed once https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=77653 gets fixed. I'm trying to fix it in #4007 but it's still in testing. The XFAIL won't probably work as it's mostly good and IIRC XFAILS fails if it's good. If anything it should be SKIP (ideally just for Azure as it's ok on Travis) |
XFAIL warns on pass, and shows XFAIlL on fail, and so never fails, and I
prefer it for something that should/could be fixed. I think SKIP better
suited to a test that can never pass (for a particular platform, for
example).
So that it doesn't interfere with test suites for now I'll mark XFAIL and
if for whatever reason you don't update the test when you fix the bug, the
persistent warning will be our queue to remove XFAIL.
I realise I didn't communicate precisely this morning, bit think it's best
to go with XFAIL, do you agree, given how XFAIL behaves, and given its in
principle fixable and going to be fixed?
…On Sun, 16 Jun 2019, 21:22 Jakub Zelenka, ***@***.***> wrote:
This should be addressed once https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=77653 gets
fixed. I'm trying to fix in #4007
<#4007> but it's still in testing.
The XFAIL won't probably work as it's mostly good and IIRC XFAILS fails if
it's good. If anything it should be SKIP (ideally just for Azure as it's ok
on Travis)
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4273?email_source=notifications&email_token=AARB52URS3PL2XMN72J3IY3P22HIHA5CNFSM4HYQPKF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXZTO6A#issuecomment-502478712>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARB52XPGU3ZETGK6TWL6G3P22HIHANCNFSM4HYQPKFQ>
.
|
yeah go for it. ;) |
Merged as 116d42d Thanks. |
@krakjoe No that's not related. Might be something Azure env specific and timings in the test. Will try to take a look. |
Thanks for update
…On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, 19:20 Jakub Zelenka, ***@***.***> wrote:
@krakjoe <https://github.com/krakjoe> No that's not related. Might be
something Azure env specific and timings in the test. Will try to take a
look.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4273?email_source=notifications&email_token=AARB52R6N4U4QVD7UMPUIWLP27BV5A5CNFSM4HYQPKF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODX33UGY#issuecomment-502774299>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARB52TE63SZWT3IG7RQDPLP27BV5ANCNFSM4HYQPKFQ>
.
|
@bukka this sporadically causes CI to fail, is this solvable, and are you going to solve it, or shall I merge this XFAIL section ?