Skip to content

Plot posterior reliable mode calculation for continuous variables and ignore kde_plot=True for discretes ones #2294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2017

Conversation

aloctavodia
Copy link
Member

  • scipy.mode is a not a reliable way to compute the mode for continuous variables, I change it for a method based on kde computation.

  • kde_plot=True is now ignored for discrete variables, allowing to have kde plots (for continuous variables) with histogram (for discrete variables) in the same posterior_plot.

@aloctavodia aloctavodia changed the title Plot posterior reliable mode calculation for continous variables and ignore kde_plot=True for discretes ones Plot posterior reliable mode calculation for continuous variables and ignore kde_plot=True for discretes ones Jun 11, 2017
@aloctavodia
Copy link
Member Author

The checks for this PR (as well as other) are failing because job exceeded the maximum time limit. @junpenglao do you know what is happening? There is something I can do?

@junpenglao
Copy link
Member

Yeah Travis is suddenly hitting the maximum time limit a lot lately, and it is a bit random sometimes.
For now, I restarted the timeout jobs, but we need some solution after 3.1 release.

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Member Author

aloctavodia commented Jun 12, 2017

Indeed is a bit random. Before writing my previous comment I restarted (twice) 4 timeout jobs and I only get 1 to pass :-(

@junpenglao
Copy link
Member

I know, it is now in a range of 41mins ~ 50+mins, and we are adding new test almost at each PR...

@twiecki twiecki merged commit dfd0b8c into pymc-devs:master Jun 12, 2017
@aloctavodia aloctavodia deleted the plot_posterior branch June 12, 2017 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants