Skip to content

pep8 test #323

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2016
Merged

pep8 test #323

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2016

Conversation

ocefpaf
Copy link
Member

@ocefpaf ocefpaf commented Jan 12, 2016

Fear the 👻 @BibMartin 😉

@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member Author

ocefpaf commented Jan 12, 2016

It is failing as expected. I will fix the offending lines in this PR. Do not merge this yet.

@BibMartin
Copy link
Contributor

@ocefpaf

Fear the 👻 @BibMartin 😉

This will be of huge help against nasty bad programmers like me.
I may have to switch to a more permissive project 😉

It is failing as expected. I will fix the offending lines in this PR. Do not merge this yet.

ok, no problem.

@ocefpaf ocefpaf force-pushed the pep8 branch 2 times, most recently from 65fd403 to beaf47c Compare January 14, 2016 19:27
@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member Author

ocefpaf commented Jan 14, 2016

@BibMartin everything passes but,

The command "find ./folium -type f -name "*.py" | xargs flake8 --max-line-length=100" exited with 0.
0.41s$ find ./tests -type f -name "*.py" | xargs flake8 --max-line-length=100
./tests/test_folium.py:366:9: F841 local variable 'geo_json' is assigned to but never used
./tests/test_folium.py:464:9: F841 local variable 'geo_json' is assigned to but never used
./tests/test_folium.py:466:9: F841 local variable 'color_scale' is assigned to but never used

Are creating those as place holder for a future test? Or do we need the variable creation for the test?
If it is the latter I can skip those lines in the test, if it is the former I'd rather fix that.

@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member Author

ocefpaf commented Jan 14, 2016

@python-visualization/folium before merging this PR I want to know if we have to merge something else first. Let's avoid painful rebases 😄

@BibMartin
Copy link
Contributor

There's no easy moment for 👻ing !
I have #317 and #297 cooking, that can be merged quite quickly (I think) ; but it would not be very painful if they come after this PR.
If others are ok ; I would give priority to this one.

@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member Author

ocefpaf commented Jan 14, 2016

but it would not be very painful if they come after this PR.

Still, let me handle the maintenance/heavy lifting while you keep your creative/new code streak 😉

@ocefpaf ocefpaf force-pushed the pep8 branch 2 times, most recently from 671d04b to 22244e1 Compare January 14, 2016 20:27
@BibMartin BibMartin added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Jan 15, 2016
@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member Author

ocefpaf commented Jan 15, 2016

I have #317 and #297 cooking

Those two are merged! Now all I need to know is what do you want to do about #323 (comment). After we sort that out we can merge this one.

@BibMartin
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry ; I forgot to answer.
I have nothing clever planned. I guess it's a collateral effect of refactorings and would drop them.

@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member Author

ocefpaf commented Jan 15, 2016

Rebased and good to go!

@BibMartin
Copy link
Contributor

ok, go!

BibMartin added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2016
@BibMartin BibMartin merged commit 81903fd into python-visualization:master Jan 15, 2016
@ocefpaf ocefpaf deleted the pep8 branch January 15, 2016 18:52
@ocefpaf
Copy link
Member Author

ocefpaf commented Jan 15, 2016

Thanks @BibMartin!

@ocefpaf ocefpaf added the bug An issue describing unexpected or malicious behaviour label Feb 12, 2016
sanga pushed a commit to sanga/folium that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug An issue describing unexpected or malicious behaviour
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants