Skip to content

[3.7] bpo-39285: Clarify example for PurePath.match (GH-19458) #19598

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Apr 19, 2020

Fixes Issue39285

The example incorrectly returned True for match.

Furthermore the example is ambiguous in its usage of PureWindowsPath.
Windows is case-insensitve, however the underlying match functionality
utilizes fnmatch.fnmatchcase.

Automerge-Triggered-By: @pitrou
(cherry picked from commit c12375a)

Co-authored-by: Tim Lo [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue39285

Fixes Issue39285

The example incorrectly returned True for match.

Furthermore the example is ambiguous in its usage of PureWindowsPath.
Windows is case-insensitve, however the underlying match functionality
utilizes fnmatch.fnmatchcase.

Automerge-Triggered-By: @pitrou
(cherry picked from commit c12375a)

Co-authored-by: Tim Lo <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@timlo: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@timlo: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 143147d into python:3.7 Apr 19, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-c12375a-3.7 branch April 19, 2020 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants