-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 607
[ET-VK] Introduce Vulkan partitioner #2062
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
## Context Introduce `VulkanPartitioner`. I based the implementation of `VulkanPartitioner` on `ArmPartitioner`. Differential Revision: [D54128090](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54128090/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/2062
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 4899cb8 with merge base 33ba563 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Warning: Unknown label
Please add the new label to .github/pytorch-probot.yml |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D54128090 |
## Context Introduce `VulkanPartitioner`. I based the implementation of `VulkanPartitioner` on `ArmPartitioner`. Differential Revision: [D54128090](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54128090/) ghstack-source-id: 216263900 Pull Request resolved: #2062
## Context Introduce `VulkanPartitioner`. I based the implementation of `VulkanPartitioner` on `ArmPartitioner`. Differential Revision: [D54128090](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54128090/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D54128090 |
Pull Request resolved: #2062 ## Context Introduce `VulkanPartitioner`. I based the implementation of `VulkanPartitioner` on `ArmPartitioner`. ghstack-source-id: 216267434 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D54128090](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54128090/)
This pull request has been merged in 83bd5c2. |
In [PR #2062](#2062), we introduced the partitioner and removed this failing test. The test fails because we were using the wrong op name. We fix it to that from [PR #1737](#1737). Differential Revision: [D54206402](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54206402/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #2101 In [PR #2062](#2062), we introduced the partitioner and removed this failing test. The test fails because we were using the wrong op name. We fix it to that from [PR #1737](#1737). ghstack-source-id: 216477874 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: SS-JIA Differential Revision: D54206402 fbshipit-source-id: 0c9ae2af9a380e8aa0e28b107a33ccd36a89033e
In [PR #2062](pytorch/executorch#2062), we introduced the partitioner and removed this failing test. The test fails because we were using the wrong op name. We fix it to that from [PR #1737](pytorch/executorch#1737). Differential Revision: [D54206402](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D54206402/) ghstack-source-id: 216477874 Pull Request resolved: pytorch/executorch#2101
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Context
Introduce
VulkanPartitioner
. I based the implementation ofVulkanPartitioner
onArmPartitioner
.Differential Revision: D54128090