Skip to content

fix: Evaluate UnevaluatedConst in unify #14891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2023
Merged

fix: Evaluate UnevaluatedConst in unify #14891

merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2023

Conversation

HKalbasi
Copy link
Member

fix #14844

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 25, 2023
@HKalbasi
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

📌 Commit 7ef185d has been approved by HKalbasi

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 7ef185d with merge fcd3a6b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 25, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: HKalbasi
Pushing fcd3a6b to master...

@bors bors merged commit fcd3a6b into rust-lang:master May 25, 2023
@lnicola lnicola changed the title Evaluate UnevaluatedConst in unify fix: Evaluate UnevaluatedConst in unify May 26, 2023
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
Insert type vars in function arguments

follow up #14891
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Const generics broken when inside struct
3 participants