Skip to content

new line after rule heading #4174

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 24, 2018
Merged

new line after rule heading #4174

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 24, 2018

Conversation

robstoll
Copy link
Contributor

The list is broken on http://dotty.epfl.ch/docs. I suppose it requires a new line after the rule heading (at least the list in workflow.md has a new line and this one is displayed correctly)

The list is broken on http://dotty.epfl.ch/docs. I suppose it requires a new line after the rule heading (at least the list in workflow.md has a new line and this one is displayed correctly)
Copy link
Member

@dottybot dottybot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello, and thank you for opening this PR! 🎉

All contributors have signed the CLA, thank you! ❤️

Have an awesome day! ☀️

@@ -164,11 +165,15 @@ def h(x: erased Int => Int) = ...
class K(erased x: Int) { ... }
```


Copy link
Contributor

@Blaisorblade Blaisorblade Mar 24, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the extra line before also required (here and below)? I thought not.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@robstoll robstoll Mar 24, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, its not but I figured it reads better in the raw version . The fix @allanrenucci provides reads even better IMO, yet I don't know if it is going to fix the initial problem.

Copy link
Contributor

@Blaisorblade Blaisorblade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise LGTM.

@allanrenucci
Copy link
Contributor

Merging! Thanks @robstoll 🎉

@allanrenucci allanrenucci merged commit 87ad61f into scala:master Mar 24, 2018
robstoll added a commit to robstoll/dotty that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2018
Seems like the last commit scala#4174 fixed the bullet points but messed up the numbered list. Since I have no preview on how it will look like at  http://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/ it's again a guess.
@robstoll robstoll deleted the patch-2 branch February 27, 2020 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants