Skip to content

add managing conflict guide #51

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 26, 2023

Conversation

kne42
Copy link
Contributor

@kne42 kne42 commented May 24, 2023

No description provided.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 24, 2023

Deploy Preview for learn-scientific-python-org ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f505162
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/learn-scientific-python-org/deploys/6470c724f3079d0008b64f73
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-51--learn-scientific-python-org.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Copy link
Member

@munkm munkm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like this!

For managing conflict do we want to recommend that projects include decision-making details in their governance also? Sometimes conflict arises based on technical decision making and ultimately the project needs to make a decision to move forward. Many projects have a consensus-seeking model, but explicitly having a path forward can help individuals move forwards too.

For the CoC violations I think we're covering important basics. Do we also want to include information on community notifications (that is, that the project documents the violation and the resolution path?), anonymous reporting guidelines, and other practices?

them.

### Assume positive intent and acknowledge
negative impact
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this needs to be moved up to the line above or you need to add the markdown header format for this to continue.

Comment on lines 48 to 57
When the Code of Conduct is violated, you should
take disciplinary action as detailed therein and
communicate to the offending party what they did
wrong and why. Assure the offended party that you
are taking the offense seriously and detail what
actions you took to remedy the situation, as well
as taking into account what their desired outcome
is.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For CoC violations do we want to be explicit about protecting the identity of the reporter also?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes!

Comment on lines 57 to 63
Do not wait for a report to take action on a Code
of Conduct violation, it's best to address obvious
breaches of the Code in a timely manner to
demonstrate that it is important and a priority of
your project. Staying proactive helps to cultivate
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I love that you added this! Emphasizing timeliness is definitely something we want.

@juanis2112 juanis2112 merged commit a515d4a into scientific-python:main May 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants