Skip to content

[5.3] The Catalina Merge #2786

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2020
Merged

[5.3] The Catalina Merge #2786

merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2020

Conversation

millenomi
Copy link
Contributor

This PR cherry-picks the Catalina merge from #2782 onto the 5.3 release branch.

@millenomi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@parkera This requires your approval and merge.

@millenomi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please test

@millenomi millenomi merged commit 0f20a52 into swiftlang:master May 8, 2020
@millenomi millenomi deleted the catalina-merge-5.3 branch May 8, 2020 23:57
@finagolfin
Copy link
Member

I think this was somehow merged into master by mistake, the release/5.3 branch shows no new commits since it was branched weeks ago.

@millenomi millenomi restored the catalina-merge-5.3 branch May 9, 2020 14:18
3405691582 added a commit to 3405691582/swift-corelibs-foundation that referenced this pull request May 11, 2020
PR swiftlang#2786 references symbol __kCFAllocatorTypeID_CONST in CFRuntime.c but
this was removed in swiftlang#1708. After interpreting the commit, it looks like
this symbol was renamed to _kCFRuntimeIDCFAllocator. Therefore, make
this rename again.
3405691582 added a commit to 3405691582/swift-corelibs-foundation that referenced this pull request May 11, 2020
PR swiftlang#2786 references symbol __kCFAllocatorTypeID_CONST in CFRuntime.c but
this was removed in swiftlang#1708. After interpreting the commit, it looks like
this symbol was renamed to _kCFRuntimeIDCFAllocator. Therefore, make
this rename again.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants