Skip to content

[Xcodeproj] Generating clibs targets 2 #235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 6, 2016
Merged

[Xcodeproj] Generating clibs targets 2 #235

merged 6 commits into from
Apr 6, 2016

Conversation

goloveychuk
Copy link
Contributor

Replaces #205
Generated for project with 20 deps - everything works.
Please review.


let rootModulesSet = Set(modules).subtract(Set(externalModules))
// let rootModulesSet = Set(modules).subtract(Set(externalModules))
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only problem is this 2 lines. As I understood, I can't do this for protocols?

@paulofaria
Copy link
Contributor

@mxcl It works beautifully here with https://github.com/Zewo/Zewo, which has 34 dependencies and 3 of them are C libs.

@mxcl
Copy link
Contributor

mxcl commented Apr 4, 2016

@swift-ci Please test

@goloveychuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxcl I fixed test case, in my mac tests are passing, please test again on ci.

@ddunbar
Copy link
Contributor

ddunbar commented Apr 5, 2016

@swift-ci please test

@mxcl
Copy link
Contributor

mxcl commented Apr 5, 2016

@swift-ci Please test

@goloveychuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, build succeed. The problem, as I understand, was with main swift codebase.

@mxcl mxcl merged commit a46c362 into swiftlang:master Apr 6, 2016
aciidgh pushed a commit to aciidgh/swift-package-manager that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants