Skip to content

Update PackageDescription.md #3143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2021
Merged

Update PackageDescription.md #3143

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
35 changes: 24 additions & 11 deletions Documentation/PackageDescription.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static func target(
/// - cxxSettings: The C++ settings for this target.
/// - swiftSettings: The Swift settings for this target.
/// - linkerSettings: The linker settings for this target.
static func target(
static func executableTarget(
name: String,
dependencies: [Target.Dependency] = [],
path: String? = nil,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1056,35 +1056,48 @@ The supported C language standard to use for compiling C sources in the package.
enum CLanguageStandard {
case c89
case c90
case iso9899_1990
case iso9899_199409
case c99
case c11
case c17
case c18
case c2x
case gnu89
case gnu90
case c99
case iso9899_1999
case gnu99
case c11
case iso9899_2011
case gnu11
case gnu17
case gnu18
case gnu2x
case iso9899_1990 = "iso9899:1990"
case iso9899_199409 = "iso9899:199409"
case iso9899_1999 = "iso9899:1999"
case iso9899_2011 = "iso9899:2011"
case iso9899_2017 = "iso9899:2017"
case iso9899_2018 = "iso9899:2018"
}
```

# CXXLanguageStandard

`enum CXXLanguageStandard`

The supported C++ language standards to use for compiling C++ sources in the package.
The supported C++ language standard to use for compiling C++ sources in the package.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even if an enum will result on 1 standard, I would keep standards because below we are having a list of standard.


```swift
enum CXXLanguageStandard {
case cxx98 = "c++98"
case cxx03 = "c++03"
case cxx11 = "c++11"
case cxx14 = "c++14"
case cxx17 = "c++17"
case cxx1z = "c++1z"
case cxx20 = "c++20"
case gnucxx98 = "gnu++98"
case gnucxx03 = "gnu++03"
case cxx11 = "c++11"
case gnucxx11 = "gnu++11"
case cxx14 = "c++14"
case gnucxx14 = "gnu++14"
case cxx1z = "c++1z"
case gnucxx17 = "gnu++17"
case gnucxx1z = "gnu++1z"
case gnucxx20 = "gnu++20"
}
```