Skip to content

Re-apply "SIL: Remove special meaning for @_semantics("stdlib_binary_… #12275

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor

…only")"

With -sil-serialize-all gone, this no longer means anything; just
don't declare the function as @_inlineable instead.

Fixes rdar://problem/34564380.

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

This broke stuff before. A smoke test is not sufficient.

@swift-ci Please clean test

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

(he says, wearing his build czar hat)

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

And I've confirmed locally that the revert fixes things.

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you send me a failing build log? PR testing doesn't build StdlibUnittest with -sil-serialize-all, only some presets do that. It was put in place originally to improve optimizer test coverage by a bit, but it blows up build time. I don't think we're losing much by removing that.

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

If the stdlib and perf teams are okay with the loss of coverage then we're fine, but please hold off on removing stdlib_binary_only until -sil-serialize-all is actually gone (Roman's patch).

…only")"

With -sil-serialize-all gone, this no longer means anything; just
don't declare the function as @_inlineable instead.

Fixes <rdar://problem/34564380>.
@slavapestov slavapestov force-pushed the reapply-stdlib-binary-only branch from dcf980b to 2e2b9dd Compare October 4, 2017 21:08
@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has been merged into #12256, closing

@slavapestov slavapestov closed this Oct 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants