Skip to content

[4.2] SIL: Profile the witnessMethodConformance as part of the SILFun… #19464

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

aschwaighofer
Copy link
Contributor

…ctionType

We use to return a SILFunctionType with a wrong witness method protocol
conformance e.g when there were base protocols.

Scope: We would end up with wrong protocol conformances in SIL function types. Any consumer that relies on their correctness could fail
Risk: Low – it seems so far no one has discovered that hey where wrong in the first place.
Testing: Normal test suite.
Reviewers: John Mccall

rdar://44691234

…ctionType

We use to return a SILFunctionType with a wrong witness method protocol
conformance e.g when there were base protocols.

Scope: We would end up with wrong protocol conformances in SIL function types. Any consumer that relies on their correctness could fail
Risk: Low – it seems so far no one has discovered that hey where wrong in the first place.
Testing: Normal test suite.
Reviewers: John Mccall

rdar://44691234
@aschwaighofer
Copy link
Contributor Author

From #19463

@aschwaighofer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please test

@aschwaighofer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please nominate

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - a7e6e9a

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Sha - a7e6e9a

@aschwaighofer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - a7e6e9a

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Sha - a7e6e9a

@zisko zisko merged commit 01644d5 into swiftlang:swift-4.2-branch Sep 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants