Skip to content

[NFC] Squash Out Some More TypeChecker Dependencies #27964

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 30, 2019

Conversation

CodaFi
Copy link
Contributor

@CodaFi CodaFi commented Oct 30, 2019

Downgrade a bunch of parts of the Sema that thought they needed a TypeChecker, but really just needed an ASTContext. The great success here is DerivedConformance, which now only requires the type checker in one place, and that place is conformance checking. The end goal is to completely decouple conformance checking from a type checker instance anyways, so there should be a follow-up here that squashes out even more from TypeCheckProtocol[Inference].

@CodaFi CodaFi requested a review from hamishknight October 30, 2019 18:30
@CodaFi
Copy link
Contributor Author

CodaFi commented Oct 30, 2019

@swift-ci please smoke test

Copy link
Contributor

@hamishknight hamishknight left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks!

@CodaFi CodaFi force-pushed the is-this-a-dynamic-language branch from e4cf7a5 to abc6db1 Compare October 30, 2019 19:56
@CodaFi
Copy link
Contributor Author

CodaFi commented Oct 30, 2019

@swift-ci please smoke test

@CodaFi
Copy link
Contributor Author

CodaFi commented Oct 30, 2019

@swift-ci please smoke test Linux platform

@CodaFi
Copy link
Contributor Author

CodaFi commented Oct 30, 2019

⛵️

@CodaFi CodaFi merged commit a5b8c64 into swiftlang:master Oct 30, 2019
@CodaFi CodaFi deleted the is-this-a-dynamic-language branch October 30, 2019 22:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants