Skip to content

[Incremental] Fix overly conservative fingerprint bug & fix tests. #30123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions lib/AST/AbstractSourceFileDepGraphFactory.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -79,6 +79,14 @@ void AbstractSourceFileDepGraphFactory::addAUsedDecl(
const DependencyKey &defKey, const DependencyKey &useKey) {
auto *defNode =
g.findExistingNodeOrCreateIfNew(defKey, None, false /* = !isProvides */);
// If the depended-upon node is defined in this file, then don't
// create an arc to the user, when the user is the whole file.
// Otherwise, if the defNode's type-body fingerprint changes,
// the whole file will be marked as dirty, losing the benefit of the
// fingerprint.
if (defNode->getIsProvides() &&
useKey.getKind() == NodeKind::sourceFileProvide)
return;
auto nullableUse = g.findExistingNode(useKey);
assert(nullableUse.isNonNull() && "Use must be an already-added provides");
auto *useNode = nullableUse.get();
Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/a.swift

This file was deleted.

6 changes: 0 additions & 6 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/b0.swift

This file was deleted.

8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/b1.swift

This file was deleted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/definesAB-after.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
struct A {
var x = 17
}
struct B {
}
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/definesAB-before.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
struct A {
}
struct B {
}
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/main.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
func foo() {
B1()
}

23 changes: 14 additions & 9 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/ofm.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,17 +1,22 @@
{
"./a.swift": {
"object": "./a.o",
"swift-dependencies": "./a.swiftdeps"
},
"./b.swift": {
"object": "./b.o",
"swift-dependencies": "./b.swiftdeps"
},
"./main.swift": {
"main.swift": {
"object": "./main.o",
"swift-dependencies": "./main.swiftdeps"
},
"definesAB.swift": {
"object": "./definesAB.o",
"swift-dependencies": "./definesAB.swiftdeps"
},
"usesA.swift": {
"object": "./usesA.o",
"swift-dependencies": "./usesA.swiftdeps"
},
"usesB.swift": {
"object": "./usesB.o",
"swift-dependencies": "./usesB.swiftdeps"
},
"": {
"swift-dependencies": "./main~buildrecord.swiftdeps"
}
}

1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/usesA.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
let a = A()
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions test/Frontend/Inputs/type-fingerprint/usesB.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
let b = B()
53 changes: 26 additions & 27 deletions test/Frontend/type-fingerprint.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,38 +8,37 @@

// Establish status quo


// RUN: %empty-directory(%t)
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/{main,a}.swift %t
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/ofm.json %t
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/b0.swift %t/b.swift
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/* %t
// RUN: cp %t/definesAB{-before,}.swift

// Seeing weird failure on CI, so set the mod times
// RUN: touch -t 200101010101 %t/*.swift

// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -disable-type-fingerprints -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental ./main.swift ./a.swift ./b.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output1
// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -disable-type-fingerprints -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental main.swift definesAB.swift usesA.swift usesB.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output1

// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/b.swiftdeps %t/b1.swiftdeps
// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/usesB.swiftdeps %t/usesB1.swiftdeps

// Change one type, but uses of all types get recompiled

// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/b1.swift %t/b.swift
// RUN: cp %t/definesAB{-after,}.swift

// Seeing weird failure on CI, so ensure that b.swift is newer
// Seeing weird failure on CI, so ensure that definesAB.swift is newer
// RUN: touch -t 200201010101 %t/*
// RUN: touch -t 200101010101 %t/*.swift
// RUN: touch -t 200301010101 %t/b.swift
// RUN: touch -t 200301010101 %t/definesAB.swift

// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -disable-type-fingerprints -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental ./main.swift ./a.swift ./b.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output2
// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -disable-type-fingerprints -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental main.swift definesAB.swift usesA.swift usesB.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output2

// Save for debugging:
// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/b.swiftdeps %t/b2.swiftdeps
// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/usesB.swiftdeps %t/usesB1.swiftdeps

// RUN: %FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-MAINAB-RECOMPILED %s < %t/output2

// CHECK-MAINAB-RECOMPILED: Queuing (initial): {compile: b.o <= b.swift}
// CHECK-MAINAB-RECOMPILED: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: main.o <= main.swift}
// CHECK-MAINAB-RECOMPILED: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: a.o <= a.swift}

// CHECK-MAINAB-RECOMPILED: Queuing (initial): {compile: definesAB.o <= definesAB.swift}
// CHECK-MAINAB-RECOMPILED: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: usesA.o <= usesA.swift}
// CHECK-MAINAB-RECOMPILED: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: usesB.o <= usesB.swift}

// =============================================================================
// With the fingerprints
Expand All @@ -48,33 +47,33 @@
// Establish status quo

// RUN: %empty-directory(%t)
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/{main,a}.swift %t
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/ofm.json %t
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/b0.swift %t/b.swift
// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/* %t
// RUN: cp %t/definesAB{-before,}.swift

// Seeing weird failure on CI, so set the mod times
// RUN: touch -t 200101010101 %t/*.swift

// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental ./main.swift ./a.swift ./b.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output3
// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental main.swift definesAB.swift usesA.swift usesB.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output3

// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/usesB.swiftdeps %t/usesB3.swiftdeps

// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/b.swiftdeps %t/b3.swiftdeps

// Change one type, only uses of that type get recompiled

// RUN: cp %S/Inputs/type-fingerprint/b1.swift %t/b.swift
// RUN: cp %t/definesAB{-after,}.swift

// Seeing weird failure on CI, so ensure that b.swift is newer
// Seeing weird failure on CI, so ensure that definesAB.swift is newer
// RUN: touch -t 200201010101 %t/*
// RUN: touch -t 200101010101 %t/*.swift
// RUN: touch -t 200301010101 %t/b.swift
// RUN: touch -t 200301010101 %t/definesAB.swift

// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental ./main.swift ./a.swift ./b.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output4
// RUN: cd %t && %swiftc_driver -enable-batch-mode -j2 -incremental -driver-show-incremental main.swift definesAB.swift usesA.swift usesB.swift -module-name main -output-file-map ofm.json >&output4

// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/b.swiftdeps %t/b4.swiftdeps
// only-run-for-debugging: cp %t/usesB.swiftdeps %t/usesB4.swiftdeps

// RUN: %FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED %s < %t/output4

// CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED-NOT: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: a.o <= a.swift}
// CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: main.o <= main.swift}
// CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED-NOT: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: // CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED: a.o <= a.swift}
// CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED-NOT: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: usesB.o <= usesB.swift}
// CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: usesA.o <= usesA.swift}
// CHECK-MAINB-RECOMPILED-NOT: Queuing because of dependencies discovered later: {compile: usesB.o <= usesB.swift}

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -798,8 +798,9 @@ TEST(ModuleDepGraph, UseFingerprints) {

// Because when A1 changes, B1 and not B2 is affected, only jobs1 and job2
// should be recompiled, except type fingerprints is off!
// Include a dependency on A1, to ensure it does not muck things up.

simulateLoad(graph, &job0, {{NodeKind::nominal, {"A1@1", "A2@2"}}});
simulateLoad(graph, &job0, {{NodeKind::nominal, {"A1@1", "A2@2", "A1->"}}});
simulateLoad(graph, &job1, {{NodeKind::nominal, {"B1", "A1->"}}});
simulateLoad(graph, &job2, {{NodeKind::nominal, {"C1", "A2->"}}});
simulateLoad(graph, &job3, {{NodeKind::nominal, {"D1"}}});
Expand Down