[CSBindings] Refactor a check to produce follow-up direct supertype b… #30436
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…indings This is a follow-up to swiftlang#30113 which cased a regression because it was placed under a check which allows direct supertypes to be inferred if previous (failing) binding has a supertype as well which has nothing to do with collection inference. Let's combine supertype check and inference logic to avoid such confusion in the future. Resolves: rdar://problem/60501780
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
|
@swift-ci please test source compatibility |
DougGregor
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…indings
This is a follow-up to #30113
which cased a regression because it was placed under a check which
allows direct supertypes to be inferred if previous (failing) binding
has a supertype as well which has nothing to do with collection
inference.
Let's combine supertype check and inference logic to avoid such
confusion in the future.
Resolves: rdar://problem/60501780