Skip to content

[android] Android seems to support constexpr mutex with NDK 19c (at least) #38686

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions include/swift/Runtime/MutexPThread.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -37,12 +37,11 @@ typedef os_unfair_lock MutexHandle;
typedef pthread_mutex_t MutexHandle;
#endif

#if defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__ANDROID__) || defined(__HAIKU__) || defined(__wasi__)
#if defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__HAIKU__) || defined(__wasi__)
// At the moment CYGWIN pthreads implementation doesn't support the use of
// constexpr for static allocation versions. The way they define things
// results in a reinterpret_cast which violates constexpr. Similarly, Android's
// pthread implementation makes use of volatile attributes that prevent it from
// being marked as constexpr. WASI currently doesn't support threading/locking at all.
// results in a reinterpret_cast which violates constexpr.
// WASI currently doesn't support threading/locking at all.
#define SWIFT_CONDITION_SUPPORTS_CONSTEXPR 0
#define SWIFT_MUTEX_SUPPORTS_CONSTEXPR 0
#define SWIFT_READWRITELOCK_SUPPORTS_CONSTEXPR 0
Expand Down