[5.5] [SILGen] Handled transforming Bridged? -> Swift. #38862
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
5.5 Summary: Fix compiler crash for called-as-async ObjC methods whose completions take complex optional types that get unwrapped by Swift.
Explanation: When an ObjC method is called-as-async from Swift, SILGen creates a completion handler to pass to the ObjC method. That completion handler is sometimes responsible for unwrapping Optionals that ObjC passes in. To do that unwrapping, a common utility is used. That common utility needs to know how to deal with various cases of Optional-ness of the source/bridged/ObjC type and the target/native/Swift type.
Previously, that utility knew how to deal with three of the four cases of Optional-ness: (1)
Optional<Bridged> -> Optional<Native>
, (2)Bridged -> Optional<Native>
, (3)Bridged -> Native
. It didn't, however, handle the other case: (4)Optional<Bridged> -> Native
. Consequently, SILGen failed to generate code for calling-as-async methods like the following:Here, handling for that fourth case is added. The number of Optional wrappings that the bridged type has that the native type does not is passed in to the utility. When the utility recurs, it increments the number as appropriate. Then, in the portions of the function where transformations are done, the values are unwrapped an appropriate number of times. Mostly that means force unwrapping N times before doing the transformation. In the case of types that conform to
_ObjectiveCBridgeable
, however, it means force unwrapping the value N-1 times after doing the transformation because_ObjectiveCBridgeable._unconditionallyBridgeFromObjectiveC
performs one layer of unwrapping itself. As a side note, the reason why this hadn't been more of a problem is because many handlers use types which conform toObjectiveCBridgeable
and as such were already unwrapped.Issue: rdar://80704382
Original PR: #38773
Testing: New regression tests, Swift CI
Reviewed by: Joe Groff
Risk: Low.
Scope: Limited to Swift import of ObjC methods as async functions.