-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[Serialization] Recover from failures under AnyObjectLookup #41647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions
3
test/Serialization/Recovery/Inputs/custom-modules/AnyObjectLookup.h
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
#import <Foundation.h> | ||
|
||
@interface ImplOnlyBase: NSObject @end |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ | ||
/// Recover from searching though all possible methods on AnyObject. | ||
/// rdar://89494507 | ||
|
||
// RUN: %empty-directory(%t) | ||
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend(mock-sdk: %clang-importer-sdk) -emit-module -DLIB_B %s -module-name B -emit-module-path %t/B.swiftmodule -I %t -I %S/Inputs/custom-modules -enable-library-evolution -swift-version 5 | ||
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend(mock-sdk: %clang-importer-sdk) -typecheck -DLIB_C %s -I %t -verify | ||
// Add this flag to the previous line to get back the original crash: -disable-deserialization-recovery | ||
|
||
// REQUIRES: objc_interop | ||
|
||
#if LIB_B | ||
|
||
import Foundation | ||
@_implementationOnly import AnyObjectLookup | ||
|
||
@objc internal class InternalClass: ImplOnlyBase { | ||
@objc func invisibleMethod() { | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#elseif LIB_C | ||
|
||
import B | ||
|
||
func use(_ obj: AnyObject) { | ||
obj.invisibleMethod() // expected-error {{value of type 'AnyObject' has no member 'invisibleMethod'}} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#endif |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have this block in... quite a few places now. Should we abstract it into another method? Probably fine to do in a follow up either way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could use an alternative to
getDeclChecked
that drops the error. It could clean up these call sites a bit and we could use it to apply more precise filtering of the errors, to drop only XRef/implementation-only errors for example.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good to me!