Skip to content

build: create and use a wrapper for add_llvm_tool_symlink #6053

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

@compnerd compnerd commented Dec 3, 2016

Introduce a new function add_swift_tool_symlink. Use this instead of the
add_llvm_tool_symlink and install_in_swift_component. This mimics the
behaviour in clang as well as the general pattern of renaming the functions from
the LLVM build infrastructure.

Introduce a new function `add_swift_tool_symlink`.  Use this instead of the
`add_llvm_tool_symlink` and `install_in_swift_component`.  This mimics the
behaviour in clang as well as the general pattern of renaming the functions from
the LLVM build infrastructure.
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Dec 3, 2016

CC @llvm-beanz

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Dec 3, 2016

@swift-ci please test

@hughbe
Copy link
Contributor

hughbe commented Dec 3, 2016

LGTM good consolidation

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor

Ping - can you fix the merge conflict?

@CodaFi
Copy link
Contributor

CodaFi commented Jun 17, 2017

Subsumed by #10337

@CodaFi CodaFi closed this Jun 17, 2017
@compnerd compnerd deleted the add_swift_tool_symlink branch September 28, 2017 05:24
edymtt added a commit to edymtt/swift that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2022
To achieve to, rely solely on `add_swift_tool_symlink` and
 remove usages of `swift_install_in_component`.

This follows the intent of swiftlang#6053.

Supports rdar://101396797
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants