Skip to content

🍒[5.9][Executors] Move assert/assume APIs onto actors; assumeIsolated() #64853

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

ktoso
Copy link
Contributor

@ktoso ktoso commented Apr 3, 2023

Description: Address SE feedback around naming of the assume/precondition/assert APIs for actor isolation.
Risk: Low, the APIs should not have been adopted in user-code yet. We opted to not provide deprecated shims, but could so if necessary.
Review by: @DougGregor @jckarter @rjmccall
Testing: CI testing
Original PR: #64812
Radar: rdar://107541711

@ktoso ktoso requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2023 04:21
@ktoso ktoso added concurrency Feature: umbrella label for concurrency language features distributed Feature → concurrency: distributed actor 🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.9 labels Apr 3, 2023
@ktoso ktoso requested review from jckarter and DougGregor April 3, 2023 04:41
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Apr 3, 2023

@swift-ci please test

@ktoso ktoso changed the title [Executors] Move assert/assume APIs onto actors; assumeIsolated() 🍒[5.9][Executors] Move assert/assume APIs onto actors; assumeIsolated() Apr 3, 2023
@ktoso ktoso merged commit 45a38f1 into swiftlang:release/5.9 Apr 4, 2023
@ktoso ktoso deleted the pick-move-assert-apis branch April 4, 2023 00:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
concurrency Feature: umbrella label for concurrency language features distributed Feature → concurrency: distributed actor 🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.9
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants