-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
SILGen: Skip emitting distributed thunks for skipped functions #68917
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
tshortli
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
tshortli:skipped-distributed-actor-thunk
Oct 2, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
33 changes: 33 additions & 0 deletions
33
test/Distributed/SIL/distributed_thunk_skip_function_bodies.swift
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
// RUN: %target-swift-emit-silgen %s -enable-experimental-distributed -disable-availability-checking -debug-forbid-typecheck-prefix NEVER_TYPECHECK -experimental-skip-non-inlinable-function-bodies | %FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SKIP-NONINLINE | ||
// RUN: %target-swift-emit-silgen %s -enable-experimental-distributed -disable-availability-checking -debug-forbid-typecheck-prefix NEVER_TYPECHECK -debug-forbid-typecheck-prefix SKIP_ALL_NO_TYPECHECK -experimental-skip-all-function-bodies | %FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SKIP-ALL | ||
|
||
// REQUIRES: concurrency | ||
// REQUIRES: distributed | ||
|
||
import Distributed | ||
|
||
public distributed actor DA { | ||
public typealias ActorSystem = LocalTestingDistributedActorSystem | ||
} | ||
|
||
@inline(never) | ||
public func blackHole<T>(_ t: T) { } | ||
|
||
extension DA { | ||
|
||
// CHECK-NOT: s38distributed_thunk_skip_function_bodies2DAC10publicFuncyyYaKFTE | ||
public distributed func publicFunc() { | ||
let NEVER_TYPECHECK = 1 | ||
blackHole(NEVER_TYPECHECK) | ||
} | ||
|
||
// CHECK-SKIP-ALL-NOT: s38distributed_thunk_skip_function_bodies2DAC13inlinableFuncyyF | ||
|
||
// CHECK-SKIP-NONINLINE-LABEL: sil [serialized] [distributed] [ossa] @$s38distributed_thunk_skip_function_bodies2DAC13inlinableFuncyyF : $@convention(method) (@guaranteed DA) -> () { | ||
// CHECK-SKIP-NONINLINE: function_ref @$s38distributed_thunk_skip_function_bodies9blackHoleyyxlF | ||
// CHECK-SKIP-NONINLINE: } // end sil function '$s38distributed_thunk_skip_function_bodies2DAC13inlinableFuncyyF' | ||
@inlinable public distributed func inlinableFunc() { | ||
let SKIP_ALL_NO_TYPECHECK = 1 | ||
blackHole(SKIP_ALL_NO_TYPECHECK) | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does an
@inlinable distributed func
even make sense? I'm sort of surprised this is allowed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that's okay because we inject an implicit if/else that either dispatches remove or goes though the local logic so inlining shouldn't break thunking but it would be good to add a test for that to make sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it should be fine to inline distributed thunks, they're the if-remote-do-this code