-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[ScanDependencies] Re-structure the dependency resolver #76700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
cachemeifyoucan
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
cachemeifyoucan:eng/PR-scan-deps-resolve-deps-rewrite
Sep 26, 2024
Merged
[ScanDependencies] Re-structure the dependency resolver #76700
cachemeifyoucan
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
cachemeifyoucan:eng/PR-scan-deps-resolve-deps-rewrite
Sep 26, 2024
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rewrite part of the dependency scanner into a class so it is easier to keep track of the global states and avoid redundent work. This allows folding the pruning unused VFS job into the same loop and reduce a lot of repeated dependency cache updates.
@swift-ci please smoke test |
artemcm
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2024
cachemeifyoucan
added a commit
to cachemeifyoucan/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2024
In the refactoring change swiftlang#76700, it accidentally introduced a behavior change that causes the generated PCM command-line to have useful VFSOverlay files getting dropped. Clang module command-line and its unused VFS pruning should be done by the clang dependency scanner already so there is no need to touch that in the swift scanner. Since the original logics is not used to handle clang module commands, it will actually dropped the useful vfs overlay that is needed when none of the dependencies uses it. Fix the regression by restoring the old behavior and ignoring clang modules when pruning VFS overlay. rdar://139233781
cachemeifyoucan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2024
[ScanDependency] Fix a regression caused by rewrite in #76700
cachemeifyoucan
added a commit
to cachemeifyoucan/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
In the refactoring change swiftlang#76700, it accidentally introduced a behavior change that causes the generated PCM command-line to have useful VFSOverlay files getting dropped. Clang module command-line and its unused VFS pruning should be done by the clang dependency scanner already so there is no need to touch that in the swift scanner. Since the original logics is not used to handle clang module commands, it will actually dropped the useful vfs overlay that is needed when none of the dependencies uses it. Fix the regression by restoring the old behavior and ignoring clang modules when pruning VFS overlay. rdar://139233781 (cherry picked from commit e5d0c207f19cb7be40019a74b8e5b02075410689)
cachemeifyoucan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
[6.1][ScanDependency] Fix a regression caused by rewrite in #76700
cachemeifyoucan
added a commit
to cachemeifyoucan/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2024
…odules When planning for a swift source module, it should not get build commands for its module dependencies. Those dependencies should be planned and added by swift-driver. This is another regression from swiftlang#76700 that causes unnecessary increase of build command-line size. rdar://141843125
cachemeifyoucan
added a commit
to cachemeifyoucan/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2024
…odules When planning for a swift source module, it should not get build commands for its module dependencies. Those dependencies should be planned and added by swift-driver. This is another regression from swiftlang#76700 that causes unnecessary increase of build command-line size. rdar://141843125
cachemeifyoucan
added a commit
to cachemeifyoucan/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2024
…odules When planning for a swift source module, it should not get build commands for its module dependencies. Those dependencies should be planned and added by swift-driver. This is another regression from swiftlang#76700 that causes unnecessary increase of build command-line size. rdar://141843125
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rewrite part of the dependency scanner into a class so it is easier to keep track of the global states and avoid redundent work. This allows folding the pruning unused VFS job into the same loop and reduce a lot of repeated dependency cache updates.