Cookbook/Console/ConsoleCommand : Adding option/argument example in test

[gregquat]

See comments in the PR #2792 I made on 2.1 branch

[xabbuh]

Okay, I understand your reasons.

By the way, is the command argument really necessary? I don't see for what it's worth.

[gregquat]

No, it's not necessary since the command works well without. But I think the example is complete this way since the command name, an argument, and an option are provided/shown.

Maybe I can add a comment or something to specify that they are not mandatory.

[xabbuh]

As far as I understand the command argument is completely useless. Thus, I think we should remove these lines.

[gregquat]

The command argument was the only one that was already in the doc. And for that matters, if your command requires any argument to work, you must provide it (that was my problem, and the answer was not in the doc) to test it correctly.

@weaverryan , @wouterj what do you think about that please?

[stof]

except that ``command` is not an argument required by the command but used by the application (to select the right command). As you are running the command directly, you don't need the command name in the input

[weaverryan]

Hi guys!

I really like this addition - @gregquat you're absolutely right that having more complete examples are great. I've also removed the command option per @stof's suggestion at sha: 16e5577

Thanks!