Skip to content

Remove GCC_CR #8304

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2018
Merged

Remove GCC_CR #8304

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2018

Conversation

bridadan
Copy link
Contributor

@bridadan bridadan commented Oct 2, 2018

Description

This came out of the discussion from #8249. This removes the references to GCC_CR (an old unsupported toolchain) from the tools. It does not touch device code (even though there are some references there).

Pull request type

[ ] Fix
[x] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Breaking change

@0xc0170 0xc0170 requested review from bulislaw and a team October 4, 2018 10:20
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Oct 5, 2018

As I can see, this is just a clean-up, as the toolchain itself was removed earlier as I recall ?

@bridadan
Copy link
Contributor Author

bridadan commented Oct 5, 2018

@0xc0170 Yup, just a clean up!

@@ -118,4 +118,4 @@ def compare(t1, t2, target):


if __name__ == '__main__':
compare("GCC_CR", "LPC1768")
compare("ARM", "GCC_ARM", "LPC1768")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wat. Why is LPC1768 even a parameter?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an old script, I'm not 100% sure if this is used anymore. Maybe in the online compiler? So I just tried to get the parameters right. I think revisiting this script in the future would be a good idea though.

@cmonr
Copy link
Contributor

cmonr commented Oct 12, 2018

Build results can be found in the rolled-up PR: #8387

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants