Skip to content

fix: remove message about disabled LS if ngcc fails #1359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2021

Conversation

kyliau
Copy link
Contributor

@kyliau kyliau commented May 17, 2021

The log message is misleading because LS is enable even if ngcc fails.

@kyliau kyliau added the target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release label May 17, 2021
@kyliau kyliau requested a review from atscott May 17, 2021 21:54
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label May 17, 2021
@atscott atscott added the action: merge Ready to merge label May 17, 2021
The log message is misleading because LS is enable even if ngcc fails.
@kyliau kyliau force-pushed the ngcc-fail-log-message branch from 5dcaae0 to f4b2313 Compare May 17, 2021 22:45
@atscott atscott merged commit 08a5aec into angular:master May 17, 2021
atscott pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2021
The log message is misleading because LS is enable even if ngcc fails.

(cherry picked from commit 08a5aec)
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 17, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge Ready to merge cla: yes target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants