Skip to content

Bump pdb apiVersion to v1 #2192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 5, 2021
Merged

Conversation

Evalle
Copy link
Contributor

@Evalle Evalle commented Aug 25, 2021

Issue

#2136

Description

Bumps pdb apiVersion to v1

Checklist

  • Added tests that cover your change (if possible)
  • Added/modified documentation as required (such as the README.md, or the docs directory)
  • Manually tested
  • Made sure the title of the PR is a good description that can go into the release notes

BONUS POINTS checklist: complete for good vibes and maybe prizes?! 🤯

  • Backfilled missing tests for code in same general area 🎉
  • Refactored something and made the world a better place 🌟

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @Evalle!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Evalle. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 25, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2192 (256dd57) into main (a789f51) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2192   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.29%   52.29%           
=======================================
  Files         132      132           
  Lines        7234     7234           
=======================================
  Hits         3783     3783           
  Misses       3157     3157           
  Partials      294      294           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a789f51...256dd57. Read the comment docs.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
{{- if and .Values.podDisruptionBudget (gt (int .Values.replicaCount) 1) }}
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
apiVersion: policy/v1
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

v1 is stable as of k8s 1.21. We'd still need to be backwards compatible with older k8s version for the time being.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kishorj thanks for the comment. What's the procedure here? Add some condition?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we use the .Capabilities.APIVersions.Has to use v1 if support is available, and fall back to v1beta1 otherwise?

@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Sep 29, 2021

@ Evalle, any updates?

@Evalle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Evalle commented Sep 30, 2021

@kishorj I'll try to take a look today.

@Evalle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Evalle commented Oct 1, 2021

@kishorj done, please review when you have time. Thanks.

@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Oct 4, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 4, 2021
@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Oct 5, 2021

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Evalle, kishorj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9cb9759 into kubernetes-sigs:main Oct 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants