-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Bump pdb apiVersion to v1 #2192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Welcome @Evalle! |
Hi @Evalle. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2192 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 52.29% 52.29%
=======================================
Files 132 132
Lines 7234 7234
=======================================
Hits 3783 3783
Misses 3157 3157
Partials 294 294 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
{{- if and .Values.podDisruptionBudget (gt (int .Values.replicaCount) 1) }} | |||
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1 | |||
apiVersion: policy/v1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
v1 is stable as of k8s 1.21. We'd still need to be backwards compatible with older k8s version for the time being.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kishorj thanks for the comment. What's the procedure here? Add some condition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we use the .Capabilities.APIVersions.Has
to use v1 if support is available, and fall back to v1beta1 otherwise?
@ Evalle, any updates? |
@kishorj I'll try to take a look today. |
@kishorj done, please review when you have time. Thanks. |
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Evalle, kishorj The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Issue
#2136
Description
Bumps pdb apiVersion to
v1
Checklist
README.md
, or thedocs
directory)BONUS POINTS checklist: complete for good vibes and maybe prizes?! 🤯