Skip to content

feat: initial electra support #1446

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from
Closed

feat: initial electra support #1446

wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

rodrigo-o
Copy link
Collaborator

@rodrigo-o rodrigo-o commented Apr 24, 2025

Motivation

Upgrade to electra

Description

This PR has the current effort in the electra implementation, it comprise most of the beacon chain implementation, ssz fixed, all spec-test passing and an initial kurtosis enabled execution with a simple assertoor check.

rodrigo-o and others added 20 commits March 17, 2025 18:33
@rodrigo-o rodrigo-o changed the title Electra support feat: initial electra support Apr 24, 2025
@@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ assertoor_params:
run_stability_check: false
run_block_proposal_check: false
tests:
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lambdaclass/lambda_ethereum_consensus/refs/heads/main/.github/config/assertoor/cl-stability-check.yml
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lambdaclass/lambda_ethereum_consensus/refs/heads/electra-support/.github/config/assertoor/cl-stability-check.yml
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to point to main before merge

@rodrigo-o rodrigo-o marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 21:44
@rodrigo-o rodrigo-o requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2025 21:44
@rodrigo-o
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closed in favor of #1450 (rebased)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants