Phase 3 First Revision

Who is responsible?	Expected timeframe	Process & activities
Author/Translator + Editor	30 days	Editor + Author/Translator agree a timeframe for the Author/Translator to make the suggested revisions (30 days is usually reasonable). Author/Translator revises the lesson. Author/Translator posts a comment in the issue to confirm when the revised draft is ready for the Editor’s review. Note: Revision is a collaborative process, involving dialogue. The depth of editorial work involved will vary from lesson to lesson. Editor begins coordinating peer reviewers to participate in Phase 4. The first step is to systematically contact the Publishing Assistant, who will provide the details of available reviewers from our pool of volunteers. If there are none, the Managing Editor can support the Editor to make direct approaches. We are committed to inviting a broad range of community perspectives, and we strive to maintain a diversity of gender, nationality, culture, age, and academic background among our contributors. Open Peer Review should remain an inclusive space in which peers can teach and learn from each other generously, as equals. Resources 1: Template 1a: Initial Approach and (if needed) Template 1b: Initial Follow-up Resources 2: Template 2a: Positive Response or Template 2b: Negative Response Resources 3: Finding Peer Reviewers for Technical Tutorials (5:06) and Approaching Peer Reviewers for Technical Tutorials (9:06).