-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 608
[executorch] Ignore leading 1 dimensions when checking optimized path for op_mul #4806
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
… for op_mul A 1 x 1 x ... x m x n tensor can be element-wise multiplied with a m x n tensor just fine. Differential Revision: [D61504544](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D61504544/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/4806
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 13dd770 with merge base 35e2302 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61504544 |
…imized path for op_mul" A 1 x 1 x ... x m x n tensor can be element-wise multiplied with a m x n tensor just fine. Differential Revision: [D61504544](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D61504544/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61504544 |
…imized path for op_mul" A 1 x 1 x ... x m x n tensor can be element-wise multiplied with a m x n tensor just fine. Differential Revision: [D61504544](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D61504544/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61504544 |
8822fac
into
gh/swolchok/16/base
… for op_mul (#4963) A 1 x 1 x ... x m x n tensor can be element-wise multiplied with a m x n tensor just fine. Pull Request resolved: #4806 Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <[email protected]>
… for op_mul Pull Request resolved: pytorch/executorch#4806 A 1 x 1 x ... x m x n tensor can be element-wise multiplied with a m x n tensor just fine. ghstack-source-id: 240122840 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D61504544](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D61504544/)
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
A 1 x 1 x ... x m x n tensor can be element-wise multiplied with a m x n tensor just fine.
Differential Revision: D61504544