-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 608
Add (and fix) OSS check that et_operator_library dtype_selective_build builds #9245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom): |
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9245
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit 429a23f with merge base c6c3616 ( BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ def define_common_targets(): | |||
# build, where the portable ops are built from source and linked with :all_deps | |||
runtime.cxx_library( | |||
name = "all_deps", | |||
deps = [ | |||
exported_deps = [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's odd that this wasn't required internally
test-apple-model failure looks non-flaky but unrelated; HUD confirms it's broken on trunk |
test-arm-backend doesn't use buck, should be a flake as well. rerunning failed jobs and importing to run internal CI just in case |
@swolchok has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
thanks for adding this check :0 |
…tive_build builds (#9245)" This was reverted due to internal CI failure; reapplying with that fixed (the new Buck target needed to be moved). Original summary: This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check. Differential Revision: [D76458040](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76458040/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…tive_build builds (#9245)" This was reverted due to internal CI failure; reapplying with that fixed (the new Buck target needed to be moved). Original summary: This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check. Differential Revision: [D76458040](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76458040/) ghstack-source-id: 289775426 Pull Request resolved: #11573
…dtype_selective_build builds (#9245)"" This was reverted due to internal CI failure; reapplying with that fixed (the new Buck target needed to be moved). Original summary: This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check. Differential Revision: [D76458040](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76458040/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…tive_build builds (#9245)" Pull Request resolved: #11573 This was reverted due to internal CI failure; reapplying with that fixed (the new Buck target needed to be moved). Original summary: This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check. Differential Revision: [D76458040](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76458040/) ghstack-source-id: 289777137
#11571) …ive_build builds (#9245)" This reverts commit 7933ac9. ### Summary [PLEASE REMOVE] See [CONTRIBUTING.md's Pull Requests](https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests) for ExecuTorch PR guidelines. [PLEASE REMOVE] If this PR closes an issue, please add a `Fixes #<issue-id>` line. [PLEASE REMOVE] If this PR introduces a fix or feature that should be the upcoming release notes, please add a "Release notes: <area>" label. For a list of available release notes labels, check out [CONTRIBUTING.md's Pull Requests](https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests). ### Test plan [PLEASE REMOVE] How did you test this PR? Please write down any manual commands you used and note down tests that you have written if applicable.
…perator_library dtype_selective_build builds (#9245)"" This was reverted due to internal CI failure; reapplying with that fixed (the new Buck target needed to be moved). Original summary: This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check. Differential Revision: [D76458040](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76458040/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…dtype_selective_build builds (#9245)"" This was reverted due to internal CI failure; reapplying with that fixed (the new Buck target needed to be moved). Original summary: This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check. Differential Revision: [D76458040](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76458040/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…tive_build builds (#9245)" Pull Request resolved: #11573 This was reverted due to internal CI failure; reapplying with that fixed (the new Buck target needed to be moved). Original summary: This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check. ghstack-source-id: 289810281 Differential Revision: [D76458040](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76458040/)
…tive_build builds (#9245)" (#11589) This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch. ghstack PR number: #11573 by @swolchok ^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/swolchok/453/base ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/swolchok/453/head Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/swolchok/453/orig @diff-train-skip-merge Co-authored-by: Scott Wolchok <[email protected]>
This wasn't checked, and it's easy to forget to update the all_deps targets if we don't check. Now we check.