Skip to content

Compare page tweaks #1474

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2022
Merged

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes a couple of things that have been bugging me for some time.

@nnethercote nnethercote requested a review from Kobzol October 19, 2022 01:03
I find myself looking at it often.

And tweak the description for "Max RSS".
The "Comparing..." heading is now at the top, which is the sensible place
for it. Also, the "Do another comparison" label now makes sense, coming
after the heading.
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

Old view:
old


New view:
new

Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for wall time, I also use it often. I originally didn't include it on purpose, because it's very noisy and I didn't want to "advertise" it 😆 But I think it's fine.

@nnethercote nnethercote merged commit b0fa2b9 into rust-lang:master Oct 19, 2022
@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the compare-page-tweaks branch October 19, 2022 08:54
@rylev
Copy link
Member

rylev commented Oct 19, 2022

I'm fine with this change, but the "do another comparison" section was above everything else previously because it is a search mechanism that impacts everything below it. In other words, it had the order:

  • Search input
  • Search result

Now the search input is mixed with the search result.

Again, I'm fine with this if makes more sense to everyone, but I thought I'd just note that the previous order was on purpose.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants