Skip to content

Update NSNumberBridging test for init(exactly:) #1274

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2017

Conversation

natecook1000
Copy link
Member

A fix in the behavior of FloatingPoint.init(exactly:) means that the NSNumber bridging tests need to be updated. That fix is in swiftlang/swift#11311, this PR replaces #1273.

A fix in the behavior of FloatingPoint.init(exactly:) means that
the NSNumber bridging tests need to be updated.
@natecook1000 natecook1000 force-pushed the nc-fpexactly branch 2 times, most recently from 3547704 to ba78f63 Compare October 17, 2017 16:06
@natecook1000
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci Please test

@natecook1000
Copy link
Member Author

@parkera These failures should be fixed by swiftlang/swift#11311 (the tests passed for that PR), but I don't want to break the tests here. Is there a delay between changes landing in the stdlib and being used in the CI for this repo?

@natecook1000 natecook1000 merged commit e36488f into swiftlang:master Oct 17, 2017
@parkera
Copy link
Contributor

parkera commented Oct 17, 2017

There is some kind of magic to test and merge changes together but I can't remember the syntax for it.

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor

@parkera Just include a link to the PR from the other repo in the same comment where you ask swift-ci to test.

@gparker42
Copy link

swiftlang/swift#11311 is still causing test failures. I'm reverting that and this.

@gparker42
Copy link

gparker42 commented Oct 18, 2017

Reverting in swiftlang/swift#12497 and #1276.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants