[5.9][Serialization] Write down SPI-only dependencies as required in swiftmodules #65344
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci Please test |
tshortli
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2023
nkcsgexi
approved these changes
May 1, 2023
|
@swift-ci Please test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ensure clients load transitive
@_spiOnlydependencies by writing them down in the same category as default imports in swiftmodules. These dependencies will be required for clients loading from swiftmodule and swiftinterface, but hidden from clients loading from a public swiftinterface.The lack of this information was revealed by #64260, as previously clients would see
@_spiOnlydependencies as normal dependencies.rdar://108326858
Cherry-pick of #65337