RSDK-4578: Python SDK Base Properties

[martha-johnston]

Update python SDK to include new base property wheel_circumference_meters

Note to reviewers: I am not sure if there's something I have to do to specifically update this PR to use the most recent API changes? I'm seeing some errors which I believe are because it's not referencing the most recent version of API.

Edit: It passed all the checks though so maybe that was just a local issue

[github-actions]

Warning your change may break code samples. If your change modifies any of the following functions please contact @viamrobotics/fleet-management. Thanks!

component	function
base	is_moving
board	gpio_pin_by_name
camera	get_image
encoder	get_position
motor	is_moving
sensor	get_readings
servo	get_position
arm	get_end_position
gantry	get_lengths
gripper	is_moving
movement_sensor	get_linear_acceleration
input_controller	get_controls
audio	get_properties
pose_tracker	get_poses
power_sensor	get_voltage
motion	get_pose
vision	get_classifications_from_camera

[stuqdog]

@martha-johnston you are correct, it looks like we don't have the latest in yet. I think tests are passing because we don't have any tests that specifically would check for this, but I wouldn't expect a user to have success with it as-is.

@njooma looks like we haven't updated protos in python in a while, are you aware of any changes that need to be implemented before we can do so?

[maximpertsov]

@martha-johnston you are correct, it looks like we don't have the latest in yet. I think tests are passing because we don't have any tests that specifically would check for this, but I wouldn't expect a user to have success with it as-is.

@njooma looks like we haven't updated protos in python in a while, are you aware of any changes that need to be implemented before we can do so?

I pulled in proto changes for typescript recently and saw that the motion service had breaking changes

[njooma]

@martha-johnston you are correct, it looks like we don't have the latest in yet. I think tests are passing because we don't have any tests that specifically would check for this, but I wouldn't expect a user to have success with it as-is.

@njooma looks like we haven't updated protos in python in a while, are you aware of any changes that need to be implemented before we can do so?

Yup, there are breaking data changes as well. Tagged you @stuqdog and @8ashar to snag the latest data updates: comment

[martha-johnston]

Just want to follow up here, is there something I specifically need to do related to these breaking changes in this PR in order to update to the latest proto?

[njooma]

@martha-johnston I updated the protos. If you rebase from main, you should be able to get all the new protos and accurately test your code.

[martha-johnston]

@maximpertsov @cheukt should be good to go for review now! all the protos are updated and tests pass

[cheukt]

can you add a test for get_properties?

[cheukt]

LGTM