Skip to content

Separate core from services #530

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Mar 11, 2019
Merged

Separate core from services #530

merged 13 commits into from
Mar 11, 2019

Conversation

mediumTaj
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

To be merged after #529

This pull request separates the core from the services. Since Unity does not have a dependency manager, the Core is added to the SDK as a submodule. This is a better solution than having the user download two different git repos.

@mediumTaj mediumTaj requested a review from mamoonraja March 6, 2019 21:03
@mediumTaj mediumTaj changed the title Feature v3 separate core Separate core from services Mar 6, 2019
Copy link
Member

@mamoonraja mamoonraja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good mostly, I thought we already added Common class though?

@mediumTaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah I noticed that too. I merged in the last branch into this one so I could keep working while that was being reviewed. I’ll look through to make sure nothing unexpected is happening here.

@mediumTaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mamoonraja it looks like Common.cs is in the v3.0.0. Branch already. I’m thinking some end of line differences turned up when I merged the common branch into this branch.

@mediumTaj mediumTaj merged commit c30bdf6 into v3.0.0 Mar 11, 2019
@mediumTaj mediumTaj deleted the feature-v3-separate-core branch March 11, 2019 14:12
@mediumTaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants