-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
Bug 2070131: Fix a bug in deletion of webhook service for replacement #272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2070131: Fix a bug in deletion of webhook service for replacement #272
Conversation
/cherry-pick release-4.9 |
@perdasilva: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.9 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.8 |
@perdasilva: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.8 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.7 |
/cherry-pick release-4.6 |
@perdasilva: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.7 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@perdasilva: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.6 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
3 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
@perdasilva: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@perdasilva: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2070131, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@perdasilva: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2070131, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test e2e-aws-olm |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@perdasilva: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Valeu @bandrade!!! |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@perdasilva: Can not set label cherry-pick-approved: Must be member in one of these teams: [] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold wait until next week - 4.10 branch is picky atm |
/cherry-pick-approved |
@bandrade Interesting - it looks like you need to prefix that with |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/hold cancel |
@perdasilva: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2070131 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@perdasilva: new pull request created: #281 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@perdasilva: new pull request created: #282 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@perdasilva: new pull request created: #283 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@perdasilva: new pull request created: #284 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: Jose R. Gonzalez <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: api Upstream-commit: e6998ff1feb3c5efac1458daa5006350c7e0eccd
Signed-off-by: Jose R. Gonzalez <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: api Upstream-commit: e6998ff1feb3c5efac1458daa5006350c7e0eccd
The condition that checks for an error with the webhook service deletion is based on the wrong variable, and the return statement is never reached, which leads to a continuous error when OLM tries to replace the webhook service on certain conditions
Signed-off-by: orenc1 [email protected]
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: e9aef37a1f293bbbf833206f2037a2f36ffe2673